EXCEPTIONAL RESULTS.
U.S. Immigration I
Federal Criminal Defense I
25 Years of Trial Experience Defending the Individual
Immigration detention is one of the most severe forms of civil confinement permitted under U.S. law. People from all walks of life — longtime green card holders, asylum seekers, refugees, students, and visa holders — may find themselves placed in ICE custody, sometimes with little warning and no immediate access to counsel.
At Thompson Law Advocates, led by seasoned attorney Peter Thompson, we understand how urgent and traumatic immigration detention can be for families. We offer strategic, attentive legal representation for detained individuals across Pennsylvania and beyond, guiding our clients through bond hearings, removal proceedings, and complex legal defenses grounded in decades of litigation experience.
Immigration detention refers to the confinement of non-citizens by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for purposes of enforcing immigration laws. Unlike criminal incarceration, immigration detention is technically civil. Yet in practice, it closely resembles — and sometimes exceeds — the severity of criminal detention.
People are typically held in:
While conditions and oversight vary, many immigration detention centers have been widely criticized for overcrowding, medical neglect, and isolation from legal resources.
Non-citizens may be detained for any of the following reasons:
Notably, many detainees have no criminal history and are longtime residents with deep U.S. ties. Even lawful permanent residents can be detained if ICE initiates removal based on certain criminal offenses or alleged fraud.
Immigration detention is authorized under several provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), including:
This allows ICE to detain non-citizens during removal proceedings. Individuals detained under § 236(a) are eligible for a bond hearing before an immigration judge, who can grant release if the individual is not a flight risk or danger to the community.
This provision mandates detention without bond for non-citizens with certain criminal convictions (including drug offenses, crimes involving moral turpitude, and aggravated felonies). These individuals are often ineligible for bond hearings, but there are exceptions based on timing and eligibility for relief.
After a final order of removal, ICE can detain individuals while arranging deportation. However, under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), the Supreme Court ruled that post-removal detention is unconstitutional beyond six months if removal is not reasonably foreseeable.
This case affirmed that criminal defense attorneys must advise non-citizen clients of immigration consequences, reflecting the deep connection between criminal and immigration law.
Detained immigrants often face multiple systemic barriers:
Unlike in criminal cases, immigration detainees have no constitutional right to a government-appointed attorney. This leaves many unrepresented, especially those who do not speak English or are unfamiliar with U.S. law.
ICE facilities are often in remote areas, making it difficult for family and lawyers to visit. Phone access is also restricted, compounding the problem.
Many detainees suffer from untreated health conditions exacerbated by confinement. Legal advocacy is often the only mechanism to secure medical attention or humane treatment.
Parents, spouses, and children are frequently separated, often for months or years, creating profound emotional and financial hardship.
At Thompson Law Advocates, we provide comprehensive legal services to detained immigrants. Our advocacy includes the following core areas:
We file requests for bond hearings and advocate for reasonable release terms, using documentation such as:
If a detainee is denied bond, we may file custody redetermination motions, especially if circumstances change (e.g., prolonged detention or new eligibility for relief).
We carefully analyze whether so-called “mandatory detention” actually applies. In some cases, ICE’s application of INA § 236(c) is unlawful, and we challenge such detentions in immigration court or federal habeas proceedings.
We prepare and litigate:
Our approach is thorough and individualized, drawing on deep experience with both trial and appellate immigration advocacy.
When clients are detained indefinitely or unlawfully, we file habeas corpus petitions in federal court, arguing constitutional violations or statutory misapplication. We have successfully litigated cases involving:
Attorney Peter Thompson brings over 25 years of experience in trial and appellate immigration law. Before founding Thompson Law Advocates, P.C., he led the Defender’s Immigration Project in Philadelphia, working at the intersection of criminal and immigration law.
Peter Thompson has:
Our firm’s approach is grounded in thorough analysis, compassionate client care, and strong legal strategy.
Can I be detained if I have a green card?
Yes. Lawful permanent residents can be detained and placed in removal proceedings for certain criminal convictions, fraud, or extended time outside the U.S.
How long can ICE detain someone?
While there’s no strict limit during proceedings, detention over six months after a final order (post-removal) may be unlawful under Zadvydas v. Davis.
Can my family attend my bond hearing?
Yes, family members may attend bond hearings, and their letters and in-person presence can support a strong release case.
What if ICE says I’m not eligible for bond?
We can review your case to challenge the legal basis for that decision, possibly via a habeas petition or custody redetermination motion.
If you or someone you love is in ICE custody, contact Thompson Law Advocates, P.C. immediately. Time is critical in immigration detention cases. We provide honest, attentive legal advice and courtroom advocacy tailored to your specific case.
Let us help you navigate the complex world of immigration detention with the care and determination your case deserves.